The first high-performance GT3 road models of the 997 generation were the GT3 and the GT3 RS, launched in 2006. The GT3 featured a 3.6 litre flat-six engine, 鈥榸ero lift鈥?aerodynamics, and an electronically adjustable suspension system. The GT3 RS, 20 kg lighter than the GT3, had a wider rear end which improved directional stability and cornering grip. In 2009 Porsche launched the second generation 997 GT3, boasting an enlarged 3.8 litre engine, modified rear spoiler and bodywork, and new options including dynamic engine mounts and a pneumatically lifting front axle to compensate for the low ground clearance. The following year, the new GT3 was joined by a revised version of the GT3 RS. With a six-speed sports transmission it was the last manual 911, and used suspension components typically encountered in motor racing. Weight reduction was of supreme importance, hence lightweight components such as bucket seats, bonnet and front wings made of carbon fibre, plastic rear windows and weight-optimised carpets. Its wide track, low vehicle position, large rear wing with adapted side plates, central twin tailpipe and aerodynamically optimised body, resulted in a uniquely dynamic appearance. It was also the first production Porsche to feature lateral front air deflection vanes (or 鈥榝lics鈥?, which created increased downforce on the front axle and brought the vehicle into aerodynamic equilibrium.
It doesn't make sense, if that would be the case, the residual would be high, which would bring down the lease payment. Porsche is putting the residual value ridiculously low, I think for the 718 it is around 50%: That means your base Caymen is after 3 years and 30k miles worth 29k USD, there is really no equity! I am not asking for VW GTI rates but they should keep it reasonable. Even the Porsche dealerships are complaining about this terrible lease rates. The fact that the sales numbers for the 718's are declining like crazy is a proof that this is not that "genius" what they are doing here. It doesn't make sense, if that would be the case, the residual would be high, which would bring down the lease payment. Porsche is putting the residual value ridiculously low, I think for the 718 it is around 50%: That means your base Caymen is after 3 years and 30k miles worth 29k USD, there is really no equity! Equity is built when the debt is lower than the item's market value.
The fact you have a low residual compared to market price, means that you can realize the difference at lease term by selling the car. I challenge you to amortize that equity on your term. You'll see total cost of ownership is not that much higher than other brands comparable models. It's wrong to attribute the declining sales to lease terms, since those lease terms are not only brand wide (all other models are extremely successful right now), but they also have always been the same for previous generation Boxster/Cayman. I've leased my past 2 BMWs and have noticed the same issue with Porsche leasing. Porsche isn't pushing lease programs so it's just better to finance with the lowest rate you can find. My options are either PenFed's auto payment saver program or Logix FCU. Logix will do 3.49% for 72 months or 3.99% for 84 months. Audi/Mercedes/Porsche/Volkswagen leases are not attractive at all. Its cheaper to finance. Marketplace Parts Marketplace Vehicle Marketplace Vendor Announcements Rennnlist Help and Announcement Forums Rennlist Forum Glitches - post them here. Test posts are permitted.
I have also driven many of the top cars out there and the GT3 is one the very best for driving pleasure. I think some like to talk it down to hopefully lower prices so they can get one? I'm not the only who thinks it's overrated, especailly in relative comparison to other 911's in the lineup wrt street driving .The vehicle marketplace makes that abundantly clear, where it's easier to find a clean GT3 than a C4S/GTS. When you have a car so capable, so composed, unless it's screaming above 6k or going triple digits, I personally find that "uninvolving" and somewhat "boring". 99% of the time I couldn't get out of second gear on public roads, which I found frustrating and "boring". 6k RPMS, sorry not sorry, but it is. For the money this is as good as it gets? Try a ZR1, 50k less and gt2rs performance. 1/4 mile. Thats head to head to a car like senna whose sales tax costs more than ZR1. Even stock its about 10mph faster 1/4 mile vs a GT3/RS. Yes those cars are much closer in a track because of the cheater R tires but in a day to day driving it, you cant touch it. I hardly think GT3 聯for the money聰 is the best car. Lol good luck with GM build quality and reliability long term. Maybe better if you are concerned with a single lap time (multiple laps will likely show typical GM quality issues) or want to impress the locals at the drap strip. Marketplace Parts Marketplace Vehicle Marketplace Vendor Announcements Rennnlist Help and Announcement Forums Rennlist Forum Glitches - post them here. Test posts are permitted.